 |
 |
|
PROGRAM |
Thursday
8 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
*Posters:
max: 70cm x 100cm (vertical) |
|
Thursday
8 |
| 8.30 –
9.15 |
Registration |
| 9.15 – 9.30 |
Opening |
| |
|
| WORKSHOP:
Comparative studies of acquisition and pathology: The role of
linguistic theory |
| |
|
| 9.30 –
10.30 |
Invited Plenary Talk:
Yosef Grodzinsky
Ellipsis in deficient language users: Parallels (and divergences)
in parallelism |
| 10.30 – 11.00 |
Coffee break |
| 11 - 11.30
|
Alexandra Perovic,
Ken Wexler:
Investigating Complex Grammar in Children with Williams Syndrome
|
| 11.30 -
12 |
Nada Vasic, Esther
Ruigendijk:
Interpretation of pronouns in VP-ellipsis constructions in Dutch
pre-school children, Broca’s and Wernicke’s aphasia
|
| 12 –
12.30 |
Naama Friedmann,
Rama Novogrodsky, Aviah Gvion:
Syntactic movement in agrammatism and S-SLI: two different impairments
|
| 12.30 –
13 |
Celia Jakubowicz:
The Language Faculty:
(ab)normal development and SM interface constraints |
| 13 - 14
|
Lunch Break |
| 14 –
15 |
Posters are hanged |
| |
|
|
MAIN
CONFERENCE |
| 15
- 15.30 |
Sergey
Avrutin, Maria Teresa Guasti, Joke de Lange: Crosslinguistic
differences in Child and Adult Speech Optional Omissions:
A comparison of Dutch and Italian |
|
| 15
- 15.30 |
Anna
Gavarrò: The acquisition of participle
agreement and some of its implications |
|
| 15.30
– 16 |
Joao
Costa, Maria Lobo: Clitic omission, null objects
or both in the acquisition of European Portuguese? |
|
| 15.30
– 16 |
Elma
Blom: Agreement inflection in child L2 Dutch |
|
|
|
| 16.30
– 17 |
Claudia
Caprin, Chiara Yoghà: Article omission
and the role of the root |
|
| 16.30
– 17 |
Bart
Hollebrandse, Leontine Kremers : Visible and
Invisible Extraction? |
|
| 17
– 17.30 |
Chiara
Leonini: Object Clitics and Determiners in the
acquisition of Italian as L2 and L1 |
|
| 17
– 17.30 |
Holger
Hopp: Effects of L1 and proficiency on the processing
of morphosyntax in L2 acquisition |
|
|
| 17.30 –
18 |
Break |
| 18 –
19 |
Invited
Plenary Talk: Nina Hyams
The development of voice in Malagasy: implications
for theories of the adult
grammar |
|
| |
| |
|
| |
|
 |
