PHPCLANCHILDES with regular expressions

4 matches in 4 utterances

2.29 per 1,000 words of everyone but CHI, in 1 of 1 transcripts (444 utterances, 1,746 words searched).

  1. and there were you trying to be so good . MOT · eng_british_Manchester_II/joel16a.cha, line 236 · Joel 2;04
  2. good job we've got plenty of pants , isn't it ? MOT · eng_british_Manchester_II/joel16a.cha, line 268 · Joel 2;04
  3. that was a good song . MOT · eng_british_Manchester_II/joel16a.cha, line 291 · Joel 2;04
  4. that's good . MOT · eng_british_Manchester_II/joel16a.cha, line 1313 · Joel 2;04
  1. MOTthat was Mummy's fault , wasn't it ?
    CHIthat's Mummy's fault .
    MOT*MOT: and there were you trying to be so good .
    MOTand Mummy made a mess of it .
    MOTnow I suppose we're going to have to change all your clothes .
  2. INVwhat are you pointing at ?
    INVwhat ?
    MOT*MOT: good job we've got plenty of pants , isn't it ?
    CHIgot plenty pants .
    MOTMummy's learning as well , isn't she ?
  3. MOTI know .
    MOToh well .
    MOT*MOT: that was a good song .
    MOTare you dry ?
    MOTwww .
  4. MOTwow .
    MOTwow .
    MOT*MOT: that's good .
    MOTwhat's that ?
    MOToh .

Matches by age

One dot per transcript: matches per 1,000 words of everyone but CHI. Dots of the same child are joined.

Matches by child

Matches per 1,000 words, all transcripts of each child together, highest first.

  1. Joel eng_british_Manchester_II2.29
All transcripts as a table
TranscriptChildAgeWordsUtterances matchedMatchesPer 1,000 words
eng_british_Manchester_II/joel16a.chaJoel 2;4.021,746442.29

What the pattern matched

1 different forms (lowercased). Useful to see what a pattern really catches: unexpected forms here usually mean the pattern is too broad.

  1. good4 · 100.0%