PHPCLANCHILDES with regular expressions

4 matches in 4 utterances

2.84 per 1,000 words of everyone but CHI, in 1 of 1 transcripts (397 utterances, 1,409 words searched).

  1. where's that little [/] little that you were xxx . MOT · eng_british_Manchester_II/joel08a.cha, line 299 · Joel 2;01
  2. were [= actually says was] you hammering . MOT · eng_british_Manchester_II/joel08a.cha, line 363 · Joel 2;01
  3. what were you doing ? MOT · eng_british_Manchester_II/joel08a.cha, line 367 · Joel 2;01
  4. you were singing it yesterday . MOT · eng_british_Manchester_II/joel08a.cha, line 451 · Joel 2;01
  1. INVyou're flirting , aren't you, Joel ?
    MOTyou certainly are .
    MOT*MOT: where's that little [/] little that you were xxx .
    CHIxxx .
    CHIhers [*] not to fit .
  2. MOTsay hammering .
    MOTwww .
    MOT*MOT: were [= actually says was] you hammering .
    CHIyeah .
    MOTwhat were you doing ?
  3. MOTwere [= actually says was] you hammering .
    CHIyeah .
    MOT*MOT: what were you doing ?
    MOTnot gonna [: going to] say it , are you ?
    MOThmm .
  4. INVthat's Rosie .
    INVand that's Jim .
    MOT*MOT: you were singing it yesterday .
    CHIwas singing day .
    INVthat's it .

Matches by age

One dot per transcript: matches per 1,000 words of everyone but CHI. Dots of the same child are joined.

Matches by child

Matches per 1,000 words, all transcripts of each child together, highest first.

  1. Joel eng_british_Manchester_II2.84
All transcripts as a table
TranscriptChildAgeWordsUtterances matchedMatchesPer 1,000 words
eng_british_Manchester_II/joel08a.chaJoel 2;1.101,409442.84

What the pattern matched

1 different forms (lowercased). Useful to see what a pattern really catches: unexpected forms here usually mean the pattern is too broad.

  1. were4 · 100.0%