PHPCLANCHILDES with regular expressions

3 matches in 2 utterances

4.44 per 1,000 words of the child (CHI), in 1 of 1 transcripts (251 utterances, 675 words searched).

  1. and that duck is eating that frog . CHI · eng_british_Manchester_I/gail30a.cha, line 821 · Gail 2;09
  2. <and that one's eating> [/] that one's eating these . CHI · eng_british_Manchester_I/gail30a.cha, line 828 · Gail 2;09
  3. <and that one's eating> [/] that one's eating these . CHI · eng_british_Manchester_I/gail30a.cha, line 828 · Gail 2;09
  1. eng_british_Manchester_I/gail30a.cha, line 821 · Gail, 2;9.29
    INVthat's right .
    CHIand that [/] that +...
    CHI*CHI: and that duck is eating that frog .
    INVI didn't know ducks ate frogs .
    MOTdo you think they do ?
  2. eng_british_Manchester_I/gail30a.cha, line 828 · Gail, 2;9.29
    INVI didn't know ducks ate frogs .
    MOTdo you think they do ?
    CHI*CHI: <and that one's eating> [/] that one's eating these .
    INVand what's this big shaped hole in his tummy ?
    INVwhat do you think he's eating there ?

Matches by age

One dot per transcript: matches per 1,000 words of the child (CHI). Dots of the same child are joined.

Matches by child

Matches per 1,000 words, all transcripts of each child together, highest first.

  1. Gail eng_british_Manchester_I4.44
All transcripts as a table
TranscriptChildAgeWordsUtterances matchedMatchesPer 1,000 words
eng_british_Manchester_I/gail30a.chaGail 2;9.29675234.44

What the pattern matched

1 different forms (lowercased). Useful to see what a pattern really catches: unexpected forms here usually mean the pattern is too broad.

  1. eating3 · 100.0%