PHPCLANCHILDES with regular expressions

4 matches in 4 utterances

3.06 per 1,000 words of everyone but CHI, in 1 of 1 transcripts (397 utterances, 1,308 words searched).

  1. we thought you were really asleep . MOT · eng_british_Manchester_I/gail25b.cha, line 957 · Gail 2;08
  2. were you ? MOT · eng_british_Manchester_I/gail25b.cha, line 959 · Gail 2;08
  3. were you having a little nap ? MOT · eng_british_Manchester_I/gail25b.cha, line 961 · Gail 2;08
  4. or were you pretending ? MOT · eng_british_Manchester_I/gail25b.cha, line 965 · Gail 2;08
  1. MOToh .
    MOTyou pretended for a long time then .
    MOT*MOT: we thought you were really asleep .
    MOTwere you ?
    MOTwere you having a little nap ?
  2. MOTyou pretended for a long time then .
    MOTwe thought you were really asleep .
    MOT*MOT: were you ?
    MOTwere you having a little nap ?
    CHIhe's awake .
  3. MOTwe thought you were really asleep .
    MOTwere you ?
    MOT*MOT: were you having a little nap ?
    CHIhe's awake .
    MOTor were you pretending ?
  4. MOTwere you having a little nap ?
    CHIhe's awake .
    MOT*MOT: or were you pretending ?
    CHIhe's awake .
    MOTis he ?

Matches by age

One dot per transcript: matches per 1,000 words of everyone but CHI. Dots of the same child are joined.

Matches by child

Matches per 1,000 words, all transcripts of each child together, highest first.

  1. Gail eng_british_Manchester_I3.06
All transcripts as a table
TranscriptChildAgeWordsUtterances matchedMatchesPer 1,000 words
eng_british_Manchester_I/gail25b.chaGail 2;8.061,308443.06

What the pattern matched

1 different forms (lowercased). Useful to see what a pattern really catches: unexpected forms here usually mean the pattern is too broad.

  1. were4 · 100.0%