PHPCLANCHILDES with regular expressions

4 matches in 4 utterances

3.67 per 1,000 words of everyone but CHI, in 1 of 1 transcripts (225 utterances, 1,089 words searched).

  1. why not ? FAT · eng_USA_Demetras_Trevor/j_fat13.cha, line 63 · Jimmy 2;09
  2. why no:t ? FAT · eng_USA_Demetras_Trevor/j_fat13.cha, line 382 · Jimmy 2;09
  3. why ? FAT · eng_USA_Demetras_Trevor/j_fat13.cha, line 730 · Jimmy 2;09
  4. why not ? FAT · eng_USA_Demetras_Trevor/j_fat13.cha, line 899 · Jimmy 2;09
  1. FATwait a minute buster .
    CHIdon't call me busters .
    FAT*FAT: why not ?
    FATaren't you a buster ?
    CHIno .
  2. FATyour not gonna tell me ?
    CHIno: .
    FAT*FAT: why no:t ?
    CHIbecause I jus(t) gonna make plum cake .
    FATyour gonna surprize [: surprise] me ?
  3. FATyou hear mommy ?
    FAToh you gotta stay here to play .
    FAT*FAT: why ?
    FATbecause John's taping .
    CHIdone you up done .
  4. FATit's almost time to go to bed .
    CHIno I don't want do go a bed .
    FAT*FAT: why not ?
    CHIcause I wanna stay up .
    FATyou sound very tired .

Matches by age

One dot per transcript: matches per 1,000 words of everyone but CHI. Dots of the same child are joined.

Matches by child

Matches per 1,000 words, all transcripts of each child together, highest first.

  1. Jimmy eng_USA_Demetras_Trevor3.67
All transcripts as a table
TranscriptChildAgeWordsUtterances matchedMatchesPer 1,000 words
eng_USA_Demetras_Trevor/j_fat13.chaJimmy 2;9.141,089443.67

What the pattern matched

1 different forms (lowercased). Useful to see what a pattern really catches: unexpected forms here usually mean the pattern is too broad.

  1. why4 · 100.0%