PHPCLANCHILDES with regular expressions

4 matches in 2 utterances

4.28 per 1,000 words of everyone but CHI, in 1 of 1 transcripts (220 utterances, 935 words searched).

  1. we could count with the eggs . FAT · eng_USA_Demetras_Trevor/j_fat03.cha, line 250 · Jimmy 2;02
  2. did you come home with # with Matthew's shoes tonight, or with Oliver's shoes ? FAT · eng_USA_Demetras_Trevor/j_fat03.cha, line 933 · Jimmy 2;02
  3. did you come home with # with Matthew's shoes tonight, or with Oliver's shoes ? FAT · eng_USA_Demetras_Trevor/j_fat03.cha, line 933 · Jimmy 2;02
  4. did you come home with # with Matthew's shoes tonight, or with Oliver's shoes ? FAT · eng_USA_Demetras_Trevor/j_fat03.cha, line 933 · Jimmy 2;02
  1. eng_USA_Demetras_Trevor/j_fat03.cha, line 250 · Jimmy, 2;2.20
    FATwheres away ?
    FAToh .
    FAT*FAT: we could count with the eggs .
    CHII have de eggs !
    CHIdey're mi(n)e !
  2. eng_USA_Demetras_Trevor/j_fat03.cha, line 933 · Jimmy, 2;2.20
    FATyou swear ?
    CHIayes [: yes] .
    FAT*FAT: did you come home with # with Matthew's shoes tonight, or with Oliver's shoes ?
    CHIMatthew's shoes .
    CHIlet me go !

Matches by age

One dot per transcript: matches per 1,000 words of everyone but CHI. Dots of the same child are joined.

Matches by child

Matches per 1,000 words, all transcripts of each child together, highest first.

  1. Jimmy eng_USA_Demetras_Trevor4.28
All transcripts as a table
TranscriptChildAgeWordsUtterances matchedMatchesPer 1,000 words
eng_USA_Demetras_Trevor/j_fat03.chaJimmy 2;2.20935244.28

What the pattern matched

1 different forms (lowercased). Useful to see what a pattern really catches: unexpected forms here usually mean the pattern is too broad.

  1. with4 · 100.0%