PHPCLANCHILDES with regular expressions

4 matches in 4 utterances

3.29 per 1,000 words of the child (CHI), in 1 of 1 transcripts (307 utterances, 1,215 words searched).

  1. I'm goin(g) draw [/] draw damp@c . CHI · eng_USA_Brown/sarah113.cha, line 28
  2. I can make a c@l like dat (a)n(d) # cut it out . CHI · eng_USA_Brown/sarah113.cha, line 771
  3. c@l . CHI · eng_USA_Brown/sarah113.cha, line 981
  4. c@l a@l r@l ? CHI · eng_USA_Brown/sarah113.cha, line 1001
  1. CHIuh # uhhuh .
    MELwhat are ya gonna draw today # Sarah ?
    CHI*CHI: I'm goin(g) draw [/] draw damp@c .
    CHIever heard of a animal that say cuckoo@o # cuck(oo)@o ?
    MELyeah .
  2. MOToh .
    CHIsee ?
    CHI*CHI: I can make a c@l like dat (a)n(d) # cut it out .
    MOTthat's not a c@l .
    CHIoh .
  3. CHIwait # what's next ?
    MOThow do you spell cat ?
    CHI*CHI: c@l .
    MOTyeah .
    CHIa@l .
  4. MOTI'm askin(g) you .
    MOTc@l a@l what ?
    CHI*CHI: c@l a@l r@l ?
    MOTno # that spells car # c@l a@l r@l .
    CHIoh I know how to spell car now # huh ?

Matches by child

Matches per 1,000 words, all transcripts of each child together, highest first.

  1. Sarah eng_USA_Brown3.29
All transcripts as a table
TranscriptChildAgeWordsUtterances matchedMatchesPer 1,000 words
eng_USA_Brown/sarah113.chaSarah 1,215443.29

What the pattern matched

1 different forms (lowercased). Useful to see what a pattern really catches: unexpected forms here usually mean the pattern is too broad.

  1. c4 · 100.0%