PHPCLANCHILDES with regular expressions

4 matches in 3 utterances

4.34 per 1,000 words of everyone but CHI, in 1 of 1 transcripts (248 utterances, 921 words searched).

  1. you were yellin(g) for them . MOT · eng_USA_Brown/sarah065.cha, line 30 · Sarah 3;06
  2. thought you were going to tell me what they were . MOT · eng_USA_Brown/sarah065.cha, line 796 · Sarah 3;06
  3. thought you were going to tell me what they were . MOT · eng_USA_Brown/sarah065.cha, line 796 · Sarah 3;06
  4. there were four of them . MOT · eng_USA_Brown/sarah065.cha, line 925 · Sarah 3;06
  1. CHICocoa_Crispies .
    MOTyeah .
    MOT*MOT: you were yellin(g) for them .
    MOT(a)n(d) ya don't even eat them .
    CHIyou know +...
  2. CHIhmm .
    CHIp@l <is a p@l> [/] is a # p@l .
    MOT*MOT: thought you were going to tell me what they were .
    CHIa@l # b@l # c@l # d@l # e@l +... [+ bch]
    MOTawoh .
  3. CHIno # it's right here .
    MOTthe yellow .
    MOT*MOT: there were four of them .
    CHIwho lost it ?
    MOTwho lost it ?

Matches by age

One dot per transcript: matches per 1,000 words of everyone but CHI. Dots of the same child are joined.

Matches by child

Matches per 1,000 words, all transcripts of each child together, highest first.

  1. Sarah eng_USA_Brown4.34
All transcripts as a table
TranscriptChildAgeWordsUtterances matchedMatchesPer 1,000 words
eng_USA_Brown/sarah065.chaSarah 3;6.16921344.34

What the pattern matched

1 different forms (lowercased). Useful to see what a pattern really catches: unexpected forms here usually mean the pattern is too broad.

  1. were4 · 100.0%