PHPCLANCHILDES with regular expressions

4 matches in 4 utterances

2.39 per 1,000 words of everyone but CHI, in 1 of 1 transcripts (412 utterances, 1,673 words searched).

  1. ok # no more sugar # Adam . MOT · eng_USA_Brown/adam15.cha, line 197 · Adam 2;10
  2. no more sugar for you # Adam . MOT · eng_USA_Brown/adam15.cha, line 231 · Adam 2;10
  3. no sugar . MOT · eng_USA_Brown/adam15.cha, line 328 · Adam 2;10
  4. no # you've already put sugar in your espresso . MOT · eng_USA_Brown/adam15.cha, line 335 · Adam 2;10
  1. CHIsir # please .
    CHIwant some too .
    MOT*MOT: ok # no more sugar # Adam .
    CHImore milk .
    MOTyou don't need milk .
  2. MOTdo you want to take the napkins for me ?
    CHIjust one .
    MOT*MOT: no more sugar for you # Adam .
    CHIone # for you .
    CHIyours .
  3. CHIwhere spoon ?
    CHI(ex)cuse me # Cromer # spoon .
    MOT*MOT: no sugar .
    MOTjust take the spoon out # if you want it .
    CHIput some sugar .
  4. MOTjust take the spoon out # if you want it .
    CHIput some sugar .
    MOT*MOT: no # you've already put sugar in your espresso .
    CHIeats right dere .
    CHIeat some .

Matches by age

One dot per transcript: matches per 1,000 words of everyone but CHI. Dots of the same child are joined.

Matches by child

Matches per 1,000 words, all transcripts of each child together, highest first.

  1. Adam eng_USA_Brown2.39
All transcripts as a table
TranscriptChildAgeWordsUtterances matchedMatchesPer 1,000 words
eng_USA_Brown/adam15.chaAdam 2;10.021,673442.39

What the pattern matched

1 different forms (lowercased). Useful to see what a pattern really catches: unexpected forms here usually mean the pattern is too broad.

  1. sugar4 · 100.0%