PHPCLANCHILDES with regular expressions

4 matches in 4 utterances

3.18 per 1,000 words of everyone but CHI, in 1 of 1 transcripts (241 utterances, 1,256 words searched).

  1. who had the flu? MOT · downs-flusberg/kate05.cha, line 454
  2. <oh> [/?] xxx had the flu so she couldn't come. MOT · downs-flusberg/kate05.cha, line 456
  3. <nothing> [/?] you had nothing? MOT · downs-flusberg/kate05.cha, line 467
  4. you had just cake? MOT · downs-flusberg/kate05.cha, line 468
  1. downs-flusberg/kate05.cha, line 454
    MOTwhat were their names?
    CHI<ah> [/?] xxx got the flu.
    MOT*MOT: who had the flu?
    CHIxxx had the flu.
    MOT<oh> [/?] xxx had the flu so she couldn't come.
  2. downs-flusberg/kate05.cha, line 456
    MOTwho had the flu?
    CHIxxx had the flu.
    MOT*MOT: <oh> [/?] xxx had the flu so she couldn't come.
    CHIyeah, that's right.
    CHIhe's sick.
  3. downs-flusberg/kate05.cha, line 467
    MOTand what did you eat?
    CHIcake.
    MOT*MOT: <nothing> [/?] you had nothing?
    MOTyou had just cake?
    MOTand what did it say on top of the cake?
  4. downs-flusberg/kate05.cha, line 468
    CHIcake.
    MOT<nothing> [/?] you had nothing?
    MOT*MOT: you had just cake?
    MOTand what did it say on top of the cake?
    MOTdid it say anything special?

Matches by child

Matches per 1,000 words, all transcripts of each child together, highest first.

  1. Kate downs-flusberg3.18
All transcripts as a table
TranscriptChildAgeWordsUtterances matchedMatchesPer 1,000 words
downs-flusberg/kate05.chaKate 1,256443.18

What the pattern matched

1 different forms (lowercased). Useful to see what a pattern really catches: unexpected forms here usually mean the pattern is too broad.

  1. had4 · 100.0%