PHPCLANCHILDES with regular expressions

7 matches in 7 utterances

10.97 per 1,000 words of everyone but CHI, in 1 of 1 transcripts (240 utterances, 638 words searched).

  1. there's Nikki . CLN · autistic-rollins/03josh.cha, line 32 · 03Josh 2;11
  2. there's yyy . CLN · autistic-rollins/03josh.cha, line 106 · 03Josh 2;11
  3. there's the girl . CLN · autistic-rollins/03josh.cha, line 246 · 03Josh 2;11
  4. there's +/. CLN · autistic-rollins/03josh.cha, line 468 · 03Josh 2;11
  5. there's some more blocks. CLN · autistic-rollins/03josh.cha, line 501 · 03Josh 2;11
  6. there's some more. CLN · autistic-rollins/03josh.cha, line 504 · 03Josh 2;11
  7. there's more. CLN · autistic-rollins/03josh.cha, line 677 · 03Josh 2;11
  1. CLNup ?
    CLNokay .
    CLN*CLN: there's Nikki .
    CLNhe's going down .
    CLNwe're going up .
  2. CLNnow let's +...
    CLNstop .
    CLN*CLN: there's yyy .
    CLNwhat are these Chi ?
    CLNwhat are these ?
  3. CLNwhere's the girl ?
    CHI0 . [+ trn]
    CLN*CLN: there's the girl .
    CLNboys and girls .
    CHIboys yyy .
  4. CLN&=gasp . [+ trn]
    CLNreach in .
    CLN*CLN: there's +/.
    CHIyyy [= jargon] .
    CLNreach in the basket .
  5. CHIxxx.
    CHI0 .
    CLN*CLN: there's some more blocks.
    CLNthere's some more.
    CLNshould we put (th)em in?
  6. CHI0 .
    CLNthere's some more blocks.
    CLN*CLN: there's some more.
    CLNshould we put (th)em in?
    CLNshould we put (th)em in?
  7. CLNhere's one more.
    CHIis there more?
    CLN*CLN: there's more.
    CLNhere's one more.
    CHI0 .

Matches by age

One dot per transcript: matches per 1,000 words of everyone but CHI. Dots of the same child are joined.

Matches by child

Matches per 1,000 words, all transcripts of each child together, highest first.

  1. 03Josh autistic-rollins10.97
All transcripts as a table
TranscriptChildAgeWordsUtterances matchedMatchesPer 1,000 words
autistic-rollins/03josh.cha03Josh 2;11.6387710.97

What the pattern matched

1 different forms (lowercased). Useful to see what a pattern really catches: unexpected forms here usually mean the pattern is too broad.

  1. there's7 · 100.0%